James McNeill Whistler

James McNeill Whistler, The Doorway, 1879, etching, drypoint and roulette

The Doorway

Kennedy 188.5, Mansfield 185, Glasgow 193.10

etching, with drypoint, roulette, open bite, and carefully wiped tonal monotyping in the foreground and upper corners, 1879, on medium-fine laid paper with the "hunting horn in shield" watermark (which is characteristic of early impressions), trimmed to the platemark, signed on the tab in pencil (twice!), annotated "early proof" and again signed on the verso by the artist in pencil, a superb and exceedingly rare proof  impression of this exceptional print, the Vth state of VII according to Kennedy, the 10th state of 20 according to Glasgow (see the discussion below),with old hinges on the upper sheet edge, verso, lower corners somewhat frayed, and two short parallel nicks in the left margin, otherwise in remarkably fine condition, having never been framed or exposed

Albert Roullier label, Whistler, The Doorway

Provenance: the prestigious John Henry Wrenn collection (with his wetstamp verso),*  and acquired from Albert Roullier, Chicago, prior to 1910, as attested by the label affixed to the original mount, right**


P. 295 x 203 mm., S.  299 (with tab) x 203 mm.


James McNeill Whistler first traveled to Venice in 1879-80, fell in love with the city, and stayed for fourteen months.  He completed about fifty etchings, seeking to capture Venice’s time-worn beauty in a new way.  In 1880 he wrote:  "I have learned to know a Venice in Venice that others never seem to have perceived . . . "  His etchings most often depict the quiet streets and backwaters beyond the Grand Canal, avoiding the longstanding tradition of vedute, the majestic views of the city’s main sites.  As one scholar noted, Whistler sought to capture "the essence of the crumbling city: its texture, its light, its distinctive enclosed calli and piazze, and its unique ‘floating’ quality."  Whistler even carried his pastels and etching materials with him as he explored the city, drawing from life, sur le motif.

Venice, a Series of Twelve Etchings (the 'First Venice Set') comprised twelve etchings.  It was comissioned by the Fine Art Society, London in 1879, and first exhibited and published in 1880, though Whistler spent the next twenty years working on it, as he refused to entrust the work to a commercial printer; part of the edition was still unfinished at the time of his death in 1903.  (See the Glasgow website entry at https://etchings.arts.gla.ac.uk/catalogue/sets_texts/?eid=venice1) 

The Doorway in particular had a rather turbulent printing history as it is one of Whistler's most elaborate undertakings in the series (the Glasgow WEP lists twenty states of rework and develops the process in detail:
https://etchings.arts.gla.ac.uk/catalogue/search/ts_display/index.php?catno=K188&rs=&q=doorway&xml=pri).  Its printing was also unfinished at the time of his death.
James Whistler, pencil annotation on The Doorway etching, circa 1880

Whistler expressly annotated the present impression as an "Early proof" (N.B. its authenticity has been acknowledged by Margaret MacDonald, right), and it is worthwhile here to examine how it fits into this history. We however need some background in order to make headway...

Edward Guthrie Kennedy was one of the most important fine print dealers in the United States at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries, as well as an avid collector, and connoisseur; he was also a good friend of Whistler's, as is attested by their rich correspondence, now held in the New York Public Library (see https://archives.nypl.org/mss/1631).  In short, he was then the most capable person to undertake a study of Whistler's printmaking and his 6-volume catalogue raisonné of Whistler's etchings, published in 1910,  is still most authoritative.

It should firstly be noted that the present impression served E. G. Kennedy as his reference proof for the state V entry and was accordingly reproduced by collotype therein.****

He clearly identified its provenance and described it thus:

V.   There is a heavy dry-point line on top of the girl's head; others,
       short, light, and slanting, are at her left, and four, slightly curved
       and heavy, are in the water just below her feet.  The background
       appears to have been rubbed down and worked over with fine lines,
       while the woman recedes more into it and is slighter.  J. H. Wrenn

These features merit some discussion and should be compard with the Glasgow entry.

The present impression, now listed on the Glasgow website, is identified as their state 10: 
see https://etchings.arts.gla.ac.uk/catalogue/etchings/etching/?filename=K1880501&catno=K188&etchlist=y

As Whistler pulled a few proofs of each state for himself, the Glasgow WEP references another impression for their state 10, which is now held at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France
(See https://etchings.arts.gla.ac.uk/catalogue/etchings/etching/?filename=K1880709)***

The BNF impression appears to have been somewhat rubbed and damaged, whcih complicated comparison.

The Glasgow description of this state 10 is somewhat different, while revising certain of Kennedy's features:

Slight alterations to the girl on the step include the shape of her head and delineation of her facial features, a dark line across the top of her head, reduced shading on the bodice of her dress; new shading is added to right of her skirt, reducing its fullness; four curving diagonal drypoint lines appear on the water below the girl's feet; new drypoint shading around the woman in the doorway reduces the width of her shoulders and torso. 

This is, in any case, one of Whistler's most famous etchings from the Venice series and the present impression is of paramount importance..

John Henry Wrenn wetstamp, Whistler's etching


John Henry Wrenn (cf. his stamp on the present impression, Lugt 1475, right) was an early collector of Whistler's etchings in Chicago,  and a large part of his collection was bequeathed to the Art Institute of Chicago in 1924. 
(See https://etchings.arts.gla.ac.uk/catalogue/biog/?nid=WrenJH
;  in their descriptions of the prints included thereon, the  Glasgow website mentions him forty times!)

**  Cf. the entry concerning Albert Roullier on the Glasgow website: etchings.arts.gla.ac.uk/catalogue/biog/?nid=Roull1

This deterioration of the sheet may well be original, as it is already evident in Kennedy''s collotype illustration in 1910!

***  See https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8559443m?rk=21459;2

****  The original Kenedy catalogue is available online at https://archive.org/details/texts?and%5B%5D=the+etched+work+of+whistler&sin=
        See Kennedy's illustration of our impression at https://archive.org/details/gri_33125012338386/page/n11/mode/2up?view=theater 
        In addition to its provenance, it may be easily identified by virture of the careful monotyped wiping patterns,
        as well as the two lower frayed corners, an original feature of the proof rather than a later deterioration.